Sunday, May 03, 2009

220 yd runs week in review--breathing, length of paces, chant--tactical implications

Review of Personal History of 220 yd Runs

My current personal record for average length of pace over 220 yds: 55 inches per pace

Reviewing the info online after the April 26 run, I discovered that while running I sometimes hold my breath, or simply do not breathe for a while after exhaling, and that this is supposed to be a bad idea. So starting with the April 29 workout, I adhered to an inhale for 4 paces, exhale for 4 paces breathing rhythm.

Despite the 'bad habit' of holding my breath and pausing after exhalation before inhalation, apparently I had been prior to April 29, inhaling at about the same rate as you do when you inhale every four paces.

Looks like the inhaling for four paces and exhaling for four paces, becomes insufficient as a source of air after the first 165 yds or so of the 220 yd run.

During the past week, I figured out how to synchronize the breathing with the chanting (chanting in the mind, not out loud) so as to be able to inhale for four paces and exhale for four paces while at the same time chanting in my mind (I can't chant and count paces at the same time). When I do this, the number of times I have completed the chant tells me how much of the run I have completed.

I find in swimming and in track, it improves performance both in general and in terms of per level of effort expended, when one always knows what fraction of the distance one has to complete, that one has already completed.

But this combining inhalation slash exhalation per a set number of paces with chanting in my mind, will be a challenge when I switch to trying out the inhaling for three paces and exhaling for three paces breathing rhythm.

It may be necessary to re-write the chant so as to be able to synchronize it with the inhale for 3 paces, exhale for 3 paces pattern.

Looking at the speed generated per level of effort put into the run ratio, I find that chanting and counting paces are both better than doing neither. Seems counting paces is a little better than chanting in this regard.

Seems that for approaching maximum speeds running one 220 yd run or several 220 yd runs one after the other, chanting produces the best results.

So apparently, counting paces during the run produces the best performance per unit of effort expended ratio (good for the usual practice session) whereas chanting works the best when it comes to maximizing effort and energy expended during a run or series of runs (effort to set new personal records).

My review of my data for April 22 to May 2 shows the long-paced running does indeed sometimes produce both fast times and also 220 yd runs featuring a long average pace length, significantly longer than the pace length when attempting to run using short or moderate length paces.

Feels like, done properly, the long-paced length style of running is the most enjoyable style, a majestic style.

However, producing a 220 yd run in which the average length of paces is high requires certain things: a fairly fast speed; the absence of fatigue; and, limber loose legs.

On May 2, a day dedicated to the long-paced style, I was only able to produce runs featuring paces on average longer than 4.4 feet on the thirteenth through the sixteenth 220 yd runs of the day.

Summary of Results 220 yd runs April 22-May 2

Length of Pace (level of effort), 220 yd times in seconds

Long paces (max effort)
0:47+0:51+0:55+0:58

Moderate Paces (moderate effort)
60+63+58+63+62+68+61+59
68+66+58+61+57+57+58+52
67+56+57+55+54+53+54+49

Short paces (maximum effort 1st 8 runs, minimum effort 2nd & 3rd 8 runs)
49+49+45+51+50+48+45+45
75+66+67+79+67+70+62+69
??+77+71+70+73+72+70+73

Long paces (minimum effort)
75, 70, 71, 75, 69, 70, 67, 68

Moderate paces (moderate effort)
54 57 62 67 65 71 66 66
65 65 ?? 55 57 60 58 58
67 60 58 60 57 61 60 57

Short paces (moderate effort)
60 60 58 57 57 58 58 57
61 54 54 52 51 53 52 54
70 68 62 61 62 60 57 57

Long paces (moderate effort)
68 67 69 65 65 62 62 62
75 66 63 64 55 55 51 51
82 70 65 62 58 60 62 57

The intellectual challenge is to figure out, which runs out of the twenty-four 220 yd runs run in a given type (levels of effort, styles of running vary) of workout, should be run faster than usual or much faster than usual.

That challenge is above and beyond in the first place realizing, that an effortless acceleration of improvement can be achieved by running some of the runs at faster than usual or much faster than usual speeds, while running other of the runs at slower than usual speeds.

Remember the ultimate goal is to be able to run a mile fast. The faster one can run the mile, the better one's state of health by a certain measure.

Thus simply by applying one's mind so as to effortlessly accelerate improvement in the mile speed, one suceeds in effortlessly improving one's health.

Audio-Visual Note: Video shows angels in the sky clad in white robes blowing trumpets, against background of sun's rays shooting out from behind clouds, while Audio renders audible an 'Allelujah' chorus.

I now estimate:

Using the short-paced style and moderate expenditure of effort per average 220 yd run, I should run the 9th through the 16th 220 yd runs of the 24 220s run, at a faster than usual speed. This would serve to improve the speed for the mile run. Also I should run the 3rd, 7th and 8th runs at much faster than usual speed, which will develop 220 yd speed and 440 yd speed.

Using the short-paced style and near-maximum expenditure of effort per average run, I should run the 3rd, 7th, and 8th 220 yd runs at especially fast speed. This would serve to develop 220 yd speed and 440 yd speed.

The clever tactic on a long-paced, moderate-effort per average run day would be to: go faster than usual on runs 12-15, and much faster than usual on run 1 and 16. This will develop 220 yd run and 880 yd run speeds.

The clever tactic on a long-paced, near-maximum effort per average run day would be to run the 1st run of the day at maximum speed. This would develop 220 yd run speed.

The clever tactic on a moderate-length-paced, moderate-effort-per-run day would be to: go faster than usual on runs 12-16 and 17-24; go much faster than usual on runs 1, 16, and 24. This will develop speed for the 220 yd run, the 440 yd run, and the mile.

Note that after runs 8, 16 and 24 I can look forward to a rest of walking a mile according to the regimen I have been following.

Thus simply by spending some time collecting and analyzing data, by varying which 220 yd runs are run faster than usual or much faster than usual, with such variance tailored to the individual nature I have manifested:

I can relatively effortlessly (if the runs that are not run faster than usual are not run slower than usual), or effortlessly (if the runs that are not run faster than usual are run slower than usual) accelerate improvement in the 220, the 440, the 880, and the mile-- all without ever running the 440, the 880, or the mile.

Day by Day Summary of Track Workouts, Leary Field, Waltham MA, April 22-May 2, showing seconds, paces, inhalations, lines of chant, per 220 yd run:

The usual format was: eight 220s run every seven minutes; a mile walked; another eight 220s run every seven minutes; a mile walked; another eight 220s run every seven minutes; a mile walked.

-------
April 22

Long-length paces

Four 220 yd runs, avg 52.7 secs
range of times: 47-58 secs

Time (seconds):
0:47+0:51+0:55+0:58=3:31

-- http://davidvirgil.blogspot.com/2009/04/47-second-eigth-of-mile-run-april-22.html

-------
April 23 reported April 24

Moderate paces

Twenty-four 220 yd runs, avg 59.0 secs; range of times: 49-68 secs

Times (seconds):
60+63+58+63+62+68+61+59=8:14
68+66+58+61+57+57+58+52=7:57
67+56+57+55+54+53+54+49=7:25

-- http://davidvirgil.blogspot.com/2009/04/725-mile-run-as-eight-220-yard-runs.html

-------
April 24 reported april 25

Short paces

24 220 yd runs, avg 63.1 secs; range of times: 45-79 secs.

Times (seconds):
49+49+45+51+50+48+45+45=6:22, avg=47.75;
75+66+67+79+67+70+62+69=9:15;
??(estimate 72)+77+71+70+73+72+70+73=578=9:38

For ninth to twenty-fourth 220 yd runs, introduced game of attempting to run the 220s in exactly 73 seconds.

-- http://davidvirgil.blogspot.com/2009/04/622-mile-run-as-eight-220-yard-runs.html

-------

April 26

Long paces

8 220 yd runs, avg 71.0 secs; range of times: 67-75 secs.

Times (seconds):
75, 70, 71, 75, 69, 70, 67, 68

Continued with game of running 220 yd runs in exactly 73 seconds

-------

April 27

Moderate paces

Goal was to run 220s somewhere in between 73 seconds and maximum speed

24 220s, avg 61.5 secs; range of times, 54-71 secs.

Avg Paces/220 yd run: 161.0
Avg length pace (feet): 4.1
Paces range: 158-172
Range of length of paces in feet (220 yd run with lowest avg length of paces, 220 yd run with highest avg length of paces): 3.8-4.1
(these 4 stats re paces based on observation of 7 220 yd runs)

Avg number of lines of chant per run (based on observation of 4 220 yd runs): 21.3

Avg number of inhalations (breathing) per 220 yd run (based on observation of 4 220 yd runs): 19.25

Times (seconds):
54 57 62 67 65 71 66 66
65 65 ?? 55 57 60 58 58
67 60 58 60 57 61 60 57

-------

April 29

Short paces

Goal was to run 220s somewhere in between 73 seconds and maximum speed

24 220s, avg 58.0 secs
range of 220 yd run times: 51-70 secs

Avg Paces/220 yd run: 175.3
Avg length pace (feet): 3.8
Paces range: 156-212
Range of length of paces in feet (220 yd run with lowest avg length of paces, 220 yd run with highest avg length of paces): 3.1-4.2

(stats re paces based on observation of 24 220 yd runs)

After a 54 sec 220 yd run that started at 7:24 PM, 'Coach Richard G' of the Waltham Track Club said to me: 'Doing intervals sir? You look good'.

Thus we have the important info that a 69 second 220 yd run is fast enough to impress a somewhat overweight grade-school boy, whereas, a 54 second run is fast enough to impress a track coach.

Thing is, one could surmise that such times are impressive with me because I am poetry in motion. Who knows whether those who are not poetry in motion, would impress at 69 seconds and 54 seconds for the 220 yd run.

Times (seconds):
60 60 58 57 57 58 58 57
61 54 54 52 51 53 52 54
70 68 62 61 62 60 57 57

On this day it was nice to be surrounded by the kids and coaches of the Waltham Track Club. Seemed time went by faster, there was less drudgery, the speeds achieved per unit energy expended were improved through the photogenic surroundings (kids and coaches and parents).

But it was unpleasant to think that these white American folks around me, including the cute kids, could soon end up starved to death like the Ukrainians of about a hundred years ago, due to the malice of the same ethnic group that did in the Ukrainians.

-------

May 2

Long paces

Goal was to run 220s somewhere in between 73 seconds and maximum speed

24 220s, avg 63.2 secs
range of 220 yd run times: 51-82 secs

Avg Paces/220 yd run: 163.8
Avg length pace (feet): 4.0
Paces range: 143-207
Range of length of paces in feet (220 yd run with lowest avg length of paces, 220 yd run with highest avg length of paces): 3.2-4.6

(stats re paces based on observation of 24 220 yd runs)

Times (seconds):
68 67 69 65 65 62 62 62
75 66 63 64 55 55 51 51
82 70 65 62 58 60 62 57

At the end of the workout, some boys spoke to me, it was getting near 11:00 PM. One of them, a white one, was shocked and impressed, that I was on my fifth mile. The other one, who looked like a handsome mix of East Asian and White, remembered me from having seen me at the Waltham Y.

-------

I realize there exist those who would disparage the act of putting a few hours into typing up and then blogging, this kind of report.

Fact is, that everything was scribbled in a notebook and on index cards before it was put up on the computer.

After putting the data up on the computer, I acquired insights that I did not acquire when the data was scribbled on index cards and in a notebook.

Putting the data on the computer allowed me to more efficiently (with less time and energy expended compared to working with data scribbled on index cards and in notebooks) analyze the data and present the data and the analysis to myself.

The analysis is based on the presentation to the self, and the presentation to the self is based on the analysis.

After this it was just a little step to turn the stuff I did in the computer for myself, into a blog-post shared with others.

The perceptive realize that my display of competence with regards to the training for improvement in the mile issue, indicates competence in other subjects also.

Analyzing slash reporting about 'unimportant' subjects like track, builds up my endurance, speed, and skill when it comes to analyzing slash reporting about 'important' subjects.

The incredible Google Desktop (disaster for me because one of my computers is 64-bit and it won't run on it properly) showed me that the typing the index card and notebook data into the computer, analyzing it, and typing the report took me 5 hours.

(The Microsoft Windows history told me that the last visited time was the current time for everything, because of the multi-tabbed browser; this was not helpful for determining when I started)

That is, this blog-report of
2257 words, 5.64 book-length pages was produced in 5 hours; which is 1.1 400-word book-length pages per hour, 451 words per hour.

This blog-report reviewed 7 workouts, of which four had never been reported on previously.

So we're down to about 451 words per workout, about one hour spent analyzing/reporting per workout, which is less verbose and time/energy consuming than what used to be the case doing a blog-report for each workout, due to the lumping of several workouts into one report.

I must admit that the level of meaningful important communication produced per word used, is better when several workouts are lumped into one report.

@2009 David Virgil Hobbs

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Monday, March 30, 2009

68 minute 5-mile run, March 29, new personal record, using quick long paces style

Friday March 27, I felt like I was coming down with a cold after the run in the rain the previous day. Saturday March 28, I got absorbed in studying the economy and did not run.

Sunday March 29:

I left the footwear as it was during the previous runs of March 26, 25, & 24. Footwear advice I gave to myself after the previous run March 26, was that the advice is the same as described after the March 25 run (http://davidvirgil.blogspot.com/2009/03/74-minute-5-mile-run-march-25-using.html ).

Results foot-comfort wise:

Left foot/leg: some relatively mild pain in front outside muscle of right lower leg, in second halfs of miles 2 and 4, which were walked.

Right foot/leg: Nothing significant.

Seems this continues the pattern wherein if the footwear is left the same as it was the previous run, there is improvement in terms of pain in arch of foot and lower leg.

Sunday March 29:

I ran the round the block course again (1st 3rd 5th miles run, 2nd 4th 6th miles walked). Style used: C, long & quick paces, stopping to record split-times (I had scheduled myself to use style F, long & quick paces not stopping to record split-times).

Time after 5th mile: 67:55 (102:00 - 34:05 subtracted for break-times = 67:55).

Pauses were due to: having to retreat indoors to pee, get a towel (it was raining during miles 3 and 4), get another sweatshirt after the first sweatshirt became wet; removal of layers of clothing; recording of split times & pains; tying shoes & sweatpant waistband.

For the entire 5 miles, I used the following chant (chanted in my mind not with my mouth/tongue):

'Long are our strides as we streamline the sky
Far is our distance per unit of time
(NEW) Our greatness of speed is famed in rhyme
Lord of Roads of Magnificence am I
Lord of Roads of Painlessness am I'

Before going out to run, for this first time since starting the running project that these runs are part of in Nov 2008, I stretched my legs using various stretching exercises. I did not walk around as a way of loosening up before starting the run.

Mile split times recorded: March 29 style A (long quick paces, pauses to rec split times), March 19 style E (long paces with pauses to rec split times, the day previous personal record set):

1st, run: 13:58, 15:27
2nd, walked: 13:03, 13:15
3rd, run: 13:57, 14:59
4th, walked: 12:57, 13:22
5th, run: 14:00, 14:32

Comparing March 29 to March 19, the run times declined much more than the walked times. March 15, I started tinkering around with a rotation involving different styles of running because I was frustrated by the lack of improvement in the run miles.

The amount of break-time was high at 33 minutes. But the first mile was my fastest ever since I returned to practicing long distance running in November 2008; there were only 3 minutes break-time in between the 4th and the 5th mile which was run in 14:00, 32 seconds faster than my previous fastest mile ever (not counting my fast miles of years ago); I did not feel as if the breaks had speeded me up.

Footwear in Left shoe:
SAME AS PREVIOUS RUN

8 m-wrap layers pad under heel +
lightweight removable sole that came with shoe +
foam/gel heel-to-toe insole +
16 layers m-wrap pad under big toe +
'toe bed' (forefoot gel pad for ball of foot and toes) +
16 layers m-wrap under ball of foot +
12 layers m-wrap pad under ball-of-foot & line between toes & ball of foot +
20 layers m-wrap pad attached to toe area of gel forefoot pad beneath big, index and middle toes +
8 layers m-wrap pad under middle & index toes +
40 layers m-wrap pad around sides and rear of heel
Adhesives: tape, not glue.
'Pretaping' type m-wrap used.
SHOELACES: medium tight on top shoelace, loose on other shoelaces

Footwear in Right shoe:
SAME AS PREVIOUS RUN

8 m-wrap layers pad under heel +
Lightweight removable sole that came with shoe +
foam/gel heel-to-toe insole +
'toe bed' (forefoot gel pad for ball of foot and toes) +
16 layers m-wrap under ball of foot +
8 layers m-wrap pad under big toe +
12-layers m-wrap pad under ball-of-foot & line between toes and ball of foot +
20 layers m-wrap pad attached to toe area of gel forefoot pad beneath big, index and middle toes +
16 layers m-wrap pad around sides and rear of heel
'Multipurpose' type m-wrap used.
SHOELACES: tight on top shoelaces, loose on others

The temp was on average 40 degrees with wind at avg 1 mph, rain at avg 0.1 inches per hour during the run (5th mile completed at 1:06 AM 3/27):
(http://www.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/wxStationGraphAll?day=29&year=2009&month=3&ID=KMAWESTO6&type=3&width=500&showsolarradiation=1&showtemp=1&showpressure=1&showwind=1&showwinddir=1&showrain=1 )

'Twas a night-time run.

It was not raining when I started the run. I started wearing the lighter gray sweatshirt, long sleeved shirt made of t-shirt type material, t-shirt, sleeveless t-shirt, visibility vest, sweatpants, shorts, underwear, gloves, baseball hat.

This was too warm. After the first half-mile, I removed the baseball hat, and gloves. After the 2nd mile I removed the long-sleeved shirt made of t-shirt type material. For mile 4 that was walked, I put on a sweatshirt.

I ran miles 3 & 5 wearing only a t-shirt, sleeveless t-shirt, visibility vest, sweatpants, shorts, underpants; for mile 4 which was walked I added the heavier black sweatshirt. This was about right for the avg 0.04 inches-per-hour rainfall rate in the 41 degrees 3 mph wind in the night-time; but for the 6th mile walked at a leisurely pace, I put on the sweatshirt; I would have been too cold walking the 6th mile at a slow pace without the sweatshirt.

Advice to myself for the next run fotwear-wise: Same as that listed in the March 25 post (http://davidvirgil.blogspot.com/2009/03/74-minute-5-mile-run-march-25-using.html )

In accordance with the rotation entered into the blog-record March 15 (http://davidvirgil.blogspot.com/2009/03/76-minute-5-mile-long-length-paced-run.html ), run the next run, using style "A Medium-length-paced, emphasis on paces per minute, pauses to note split-times".

Chant to use:

'Great is our speed as we streamline the sky,
Many are our steps per unit of time,
Lord of roads of magnificence am I
Lord of roads of painlessness am I'

Running tactics/strategy

The previous run March 26, was according to my post-run notes, "my biggest step backwards in a long time". Strangely enough, this run was my biggest step forwards in a long time.

Possible causes of the superior performance March 29: stretching the legs before the run--for the first time since I got back into running around November 2008 I stretched my legs the way I was taught to in high school; two days of rest prior the day of the run; the new line added to the chant.

Looking at the improvement from March 19 when I set a personal record of 71:35 to March 29 when I set a personal record of 67:55, I will be at my goal of 55.2 minutes for the five miles, around May 8. This indicates an acceleration in the rate of improvement.

The rate of improvement March 29 to March 19 was about five times better than what 10k runners consider to be an excellent rate of improvement.

Things have not been what they have seemed to have been: the last few days, I felt as if I had stagnated and was not going to get any faster, but the rate of improvement March 19-29 turned out to be good; March 29 running using a high rate of steps per minute I did not feel like I was going as fast as I actually was.

Possible tactical innovation: stop every half mile for a four minute break, as a way of teaching the body to get out of the habit of running at a slow pace and to develop the habit of running at a faster pace.

Labels: , , , , , ,

SM
GA
SC