Sunday, September 10, 2006

The Insanity of Valuing Only Intelligence and Numerous Progeny In Humans

The way some people carry on, you can just imagine their ancestors of a few centuries ago, exterminating hundreds of thousands of people gifted in terms of qualities such as sexiness, using this or that excuse, i.e.: "those sexy women are evil witches because they give men boners; those beautiful people are descended from fallen angels".

Qualities that can be considered in evaluating human beings are: voice, personality, appearance, intelligence, sexiness, success in producing large numbers of descendants or progeny.

The fact some creature succeeds in producing more grandchildren than its fellow creatures, does not mean that it excels its fellow creatures in terms of voice personality appearance intelligence sexiness.

As a matter of fact you would expect the group that scores highest in the production of offspring criteria, to be of low intelligence compared to the group that scored highest in the intelligence category, or the group that scored highest in the appearance or personality or sexiness category.

The more you as a judge emphasized the criteria rating how high the person scores in terms of production of large numbers of grandkids, the less you would emphasize qualities such as voice personality appearance intelligence and sexiness.

The reasonable assumption is that the people who are in the group composed of the sexiest people, are equal in personality and intelligence to the people who are average in sexiness. Therefore since sexy + personality excels personality by itself generally speaking, sexiness should be considered a plus, not something to be scorned or persecuted.

Persons united in holy matrimony are able to enjoy the sexiness of their spouses without sinning against God.

The reasonable assumption is, that the sexy are as tough in terms of ability to be a martyr-saint as the people who are not sexy. Thus generally speaking the sexy of average martyr-saint ability excels those who are average in terms of sexiness and also in terms of ability to be a martyr-saint.

In any case obviously the ability and inclination to be a martyr is but one of the components of personality, and but one of the traits that help groups to survive, flourish, and live honorably.

Of course you get situations where person A who is not sexy, has a better personality than person B who is sexy--but generally speaking, the fact remains that it is reasonable to assume that the sexy people and those of average sexiness are equal in terms of personality.

It is sane to value in humans not just intelligence or production of large numbers of progeny--but also voice, personality appearance and sexiness. Those from the group that excels in a given area area X, can reasonably and ethically be assumed--in real life there are real life problems such as misjudgement, demagogic typicalism--to be equal to groups that do not excel in the given area X in terms of standing in areas other than the given area X.

Typicalist demagogues end up attacking those who excel in voice personality appearance intelligence and sexiness, because those who excel are atypical. By way of contrast, the cleverly altruistic philanthropists, promote those who excel in terms of voice personality appearance intelligence and sexiness, because they realize that human beings are able to without sinning, enjoy other human beings who are gifted in terms of qualities such as voice personality appearance intelligence and sexiness.



@2006 David Virgil Hobbs

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

SM
GA
SC