Christians of the US democracy like sheep oblivious to existence of natural predators
Amazing the way Christians, in a democratic nation, remind you of some kind of animal that is eaten in large amounts by predators, because it is a foolish type of animal.
Christianity, follows a prophet who was a friend of the poor and a harsh critic of the rich. Democracy, with the sharing of resources it enforces, is a relatively new thing in the world compared to monarchy, compared to plutocracy. Even after voting rights were introduced, they were restricted for a long time to men of substantial property.
Thus Christians in democracies have enemies, such as those who prospered under monarchy, and see democracy, liberalism and populism as threats. I would say the correct answer is that both democracies and monarchies can be either poor or good choices depending on time and place, nevertheless there are fanatics on both sides of the issues including democracy-haters. Yet despite the fact that it is obvious that Christians who believe in democracy, and Christians who live in democracies, have reason to be cautious, what we have in the USA is Christians who are childish, irresponsible, ignorant, mentally inactive, foolish, like sheep who do not fear and are unaware of the existence of wolves.
Such Christians look on the Satanism being practiced amongst them as campily humorous. Whereas the reality is, that Satanism is something to be approached with serious caution. Satanism has to do with the rejection of the moral codes found in religions that glorify God. It goes hand in hand with criminalism.
Persons who are seriously criminal, see the moral codes of the religions, which are moral codes that are like twins of legal codes, as an enemy, and they see persons committed to live by such moral codes as threats.
Once a person becomes guilty of theft, murder, slander, fraud, deceit, lies etc., that person can begin to see the mainstream moral codes as a mortal enemy. Satanism, can be a criminalist threat to the security of persons and their property, insofar as it rejects moral and legal codes that serve the purpose of protecting life, liberty and property.
Although God revering religious societies have featured slaves, what is forgotten is that generation after generation they have also featured the presence of large numbers of persons who were NOT slaves.
Foolish as it may be to get hung up on the faults of one particular ethnic group, whilst forgetting the real and serious faults of other ethnic groups, foolish as it may be to forget the good qualities of a given ethnic group or the members of an ethnic group who are atypical, unlike typical members of that group, nevertheless it would also be foolish to ignore how the Jewish ethnic group, has been a significant element in the groups featuring contempt for Christianity and democracy, criminalism,
and Satanism.
Yet what we see nowadays even in circles opposed to this element amongst the Jews, is an almost fanatic bending over backwards to be polite with Jews. The harshest critics of the Jews are ever eager to be polite to Jews, to sponsor Jews who find fault with Jews, and to find fault with those who find fault with Jews.
An example of this is the debate regarding the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" a pamphlet or tract which originated in the eighteenth or nineteenth century. The tract features the thoughts of someone who is supposed to be a Jewish leader, the Jewish leader basically advocates a stealthy, no-holds-barred war on the Gentiles.
The debate rages on and on regarding whether the tract was authored by Jewish leaders or authored by
impostors pretending to be Jewish leaders. Though it is almost impossible to be certain regarding whether such tracts that appeared long ago were produced by impostors, you have true believers on both sides, some convinced the tract was written by impostors others convinced it was written by Jewish leaders.
Amongst those who are critics of the Jewish influence in society, you find men who eagerly find the Jews innocent on the grounds that the "Protocols" tract supposedly was written by impostors.
By way of contrast, the reasonable thing would be to give some weight to the fact that this tract, "Protocols", has been said to have been very popular with Jewish households in pre World War Two europe. It has been said that it would be hard to find a Jewish household in europe of those days, that did not keep a revered copy of the Protocols.
So the point is, what difference does it make whether the tract was written by impostors or not, especially seeing it is so hard to tell if it was written by impostors or not, if so many Jewish households were in possession of treasured copies of the tract?
@2006 David Virgil Hobbs
Christianity, follows a prophet who was a friend of the poor and a harsh critic of the rich. Democracy, with the sharing of resources it enforces, is a relatively new thing in the world compared to monarchy, compared to plutocracy. Even after voting rights were introduced, they were restricted for a long time to men of substantial property.
Thus Christians in democracies have enemies, such as those who prospered under monarchy, and see democracy, liberalism and populism as threats. I would say the correct answer is that both democracies and monarchies can be either poor or good choices depending on time and place, nevertheless there are fanatics on both sides of the issues including democracy-haters. Yet despite the fact that it is obvious that Christians who believe in democracy, and Christians who live in democracies, have reason to be cautious, what we have in the USA is Christians who are childish, irresponsible, ignorant, mentally inactive, foolish, like sheep who do not fear and are unaware of the existence of wolves.
Such Christians look on the Satanism being practiced amongst them as campily humorous. Whereas the reality is, that Satanism is something to be approached with serious caution. Satanism has to do with the rejection of the moral codes found in religions that glorify God. It goes hand in hand with criminalism.
Persons who are seriously criminal, see the moral codes of the religions, which are moral codes that are like twins of legal codes, as an enemy, and they see persons committed to live by such moral codes as threats.
Once a person becomes guilty of theft, murder, slander, fraud, deceit, lies etc., that person can begin to see the mainstream moral codes as a mortal enemy. Satanism, can be a criminalist threat to the security of persons and their property, insofar as it rejects moral and legal codes that serve the purpose of protecting life, liberty and property.
Although God revering religious societies have featured slaves, what is forgotten is that generation after generation they have also featured the presence of large numbers of persons who were NOT slaves.
Foolish as it may be to get hung up on the faults of one particular ethnic group, whilst forgetting the real and serious faults of other ethnic groups, foolish as it may be to forget the good qualities of a given ethnic group or the members of an ethnic group who are atypical, unlike typical members of that group, nevertheless it would also be foolish to ignore how the Jewish ethnic group, has been a significant element in the groups featuring contempt for Christianity and democracy, criminalism,
and Satanism.
Yet what we see nowadays even in circles opposed to this element amongst the Jews, is an almost fanatic bending over backwards to be polite with Jews. The harshest critics of the Jews are ever eager to be polite to Jews, to sponsor Jews who find fault with Jews, and to find fault with those who find fault with Jews.
An example of this is the debate regarding the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" a pamphlet or tract which originated in the eighteenth or nineteenth century. The tract features the thoughts of someone who is supposed to be a Jewish leader, the Jewish leader basically advocates a stealthy, no-holds-barred war on the Gentiles.
The debate rages on and on regarding whether the tract was authored by Jewish leaders or authored by
impostors pretending to be Jewish leaders. Though it is almost impossible to be certain regarding whether such tracts that appeared long ago were produced by impostors, you have true believers on both sides, some convinced the tract was written by impostors others convinced it was written by Jewish leaders.
Amongst those who are critics of the Jewish influence in society, you find men who eagerly find the Jews innocent on the grounds that the "Protocols" tract supposedly was written by impostors.
By way of contrast, the reasonable thing would be to give some weight to the fact that this tract, "Protocols", has been said to have been very popular with Jewish households in pre World War Two europe. It has been said that it would be hard to find a Jewish household in europe of those days, that did not keep a revered copy of the Protocols.
So the point is, what difference does it make whether the tract was written by impostors or not, especially seeing it is so hard to tell if it was written by impostors or not, if so many Jewish households were in possession of treasured copies of the tract?
@2006 David Virgil Hobbs
posted by David Virgil at 11:15 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home