Straussianism plus Judaism plus Israelism equals a prescription for unethical ethnocentrism and atheiocentrism
Atheistic Straussianism, in practical terms, finds its adherents amongst persons who are ethnically Jewish, persons whose religion is is Jewish, persons whose first loyalty is to the state of Israel.
The theistic person strives to obey and purify his conscience, because he fears God; such is reasonable, because a man's conscience, is a man's idea, however mistaken, of what God's will is for him as an individual. By way of contrast, there is no reason for the brazen atheist to fear divine retribution re violations of and inpurity of conscience.
The various forms of Judaism and neo-Judaism, to one degree or another, free the adherent of Judaism from the burden of behaving ethically with regards to non-Jews. By way of contrast, Christianity teaches religious tolerance and promotes ethical conduct on the part of Christians vis a vis non-Christians and members of foreign races.
Human nature and the ethical systems of human societies, produce in humans a relative lack of inhibition regarding humans of foregin nation-states. Treason is abhorred by human societies, and human societies tolerate aggression against foreign societies (war, spying) that they do not tolerate within a society (murder, theft, fraud).
Thus you have the uninhibited unrestrained selfishness of atheism, combined with the uninhibited aggression against "non-kosher" persons found in Judaism, combined with the lack of inhibition persons loyal to a nation-state feel regarding their conduct with regards to persons of a foreign nation-state feel regarding their conduct with regards to persons of a foreign nation-state.
The combination of these three types of lack of inhibition, can be expected to lead to conduct on the part of the uninhibited, that is excessively uninhibited and aggressive in terms of its impact on persons who are not Jewish or Israeli.
@2005 David Virgil Hobbs
The theistic person strives to obey and purify his conscience, because he fears God; such is reasonable, because a man's conscience, is a man's idea, however mistaken, of what God's will is for him as an individual. By way of contrast, there is no reason for the brazen atheist to fear divine retribution re violations of and inpurity of conscience.
The various forms of Judaism and neo-Judaism, to one degree or another, free the adherent of Judaism from the burden of behaving ethically with regards to non-Jews. By way of contrast, Christianity teaches religious tolerance and promotes ethical conduct on the part of Christians vis a vis non-Christians and members of foreign races.
Human nature and the ethical systems of human societies, produce in humans a relative lack of inhibition regarding humans of foregin nation-states. Treason is abhorred by human societies, and human societies tolerate aggression against foreign societies (war, spying) that they do not tolerate within a society (murder, theft, fraud).
Thus you have the uninhibited unrestrained selfishness of atheism, combined with the uninhibited aggression against "non-kosher" persons found in Judaism, combined with the lack of inhibition persons loyal to a nation-state feel regarding their conduct with regards to persons of a foreign nation-state feel regarding their conduct with regards to persons of a foreign nation-state.
The combination of these three types of lack of inhibition, can be expected to lead to conduct on the part of the uninhibited, that is excessively uninhibited and aggressive in terms of its impact on persons who are not Jewish or Israeli.
@2005 David Virgil Hobbs
posted by David Virgil at 11:03 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home