false flag attacks favored by Senator Blather in DVH interview
DVH Interview: Senator Billy Jo Blather
Posted: October 1, 2009 0621 GMT
David Virgil BIO
DVH Anchor
David Virgil: Senator Blather, you have stated that you are in favor of the US government in the future resorting to false flag attacks in the US. False flag attacks involve basically a government attacking its own nation, so as to get the nation angry and involved in attacking the nation that allegedly committed the attack. Could you elaborate?
Senator Blather: We haf a problem in our country, which is thet th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity, be hankerin' t'pareesitize th' hard-wawkin' mino'ity. In o'der t'combat this hyar problem, we need t'be able t'do reso't t'extryjudicial black ops black budgit operashuns direcked aginst th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity. In o'der fo' sech operashuns t'succeed, we need t'create an atmosphar in which them who deman' thet th' truth be known an' thet th' ajunts who carry out th' black ops be punished, is ridiculed as crazy. A trimenjus fine o'ganized false-flag attack, will haf th' beneficial side-effeck of creatin' this hyar kind of invironment, an invironment in which them who believe o' at least meekly accepp th' disinfo'mashun we prodooce regardin' th' false flag attack, an' regardin' other operashuns direcked aginst th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity, is hono'ed as fine citizens, wharas them who agitate fo' th' truth an' fo' prosecushun of th' so-called guilty parties, is condemned as insane. Then we will haf th' kind of invironment thet we as an outnumbered mino'ity need, an invironment in which corncern fo' truth is cornsidered insane, wharas faif in disinfo'mashun, an' votin' fo' an' corntributin' t'th' disinfo-sources, is cornsidered hono'able. When we haf th' right kind of invironment, we will be able t'terminate th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity an' transfer th' resources of th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity wifout their cornsent. Their cornsent sh'd not an issue on account o' they is stoopid. Wif th' right invironment, th' varmints will does th' right thin' an' believe our respeckable disinfo about how we is not guilty, vote fo' us, an' corntribute financially t'our political campaigns.
David Virgil: Isnt it possible that if the US in the future adopts false-flag attack tactics, the result could be a societal environment in which government habitually attacks its citizens, using the excuse that it is all in the national interest?
Senator Blather: On account o' th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity is sech a large group, we hafta reso't t'covaht operashuns aginst th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity. We need t'terminate, incaracerate, third-degree interrogate, an involuntarily transfer the resources of th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity, so as t'prevent th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity fum committin' crimes aginst th' hard-wawkin' mino'ity. When it is firmly established thet govment has a right t'attack its citizens as a way of furtherin' th' nashunal interest; when it is firmly established thet govment has a right t'spread disinfo'mashun regardin' who acshully committed th' so-called crimes, when them who believe th' so-called truth an' clamo' fo' truth is considered insane, an' when them who commendably accepp th' disinfo'mashun as truth is respecked, we will then be in a posishun t'succeed in an' git away wif covaht black ops direcked aginst th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity. Then we will be able t'transfer th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity's money into our accounts, an' ev'ryone will believe our disinfo regardin' how we did not does it, an' them who rejeck our disinfo will be disrespecked as insane.
David Virgil: If the US in the future resorts to false-flag attacks against the US, could this create a problem in terms of the US being stampeded into doing things that are not in its national interest?
Senator Blather: It is in th' interests of th' hard-wawkin' mino'ity, t'git th' US t'do thin's thet is not in its nashunal interest. Tharfo'e th' US doin' thin's thet is not in th' US nashunal interest, acshully sarves th' interests of th' United States. Wifout false-flag attacks, it is difficult t'git th' US t'do thin's thet is not in its nashunal interest. But eff'n th' US reckons thet some group thet has not acshully attacked th' US has indeed attacked th' US, then we will be able t'trick th' US into doin' sumpin thet is not in its nashunal interest. This hyar will weaken th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity an' proteck th' hard wawkin' mino'ity fum attacks by th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity thet'd otherwise be inevitable.
David Virgil: It is hard to understand how the US doing things that are not in the US national interest, could be in the national interest of the US.
Senator Blather: When th' US goes t'war, fightin' some war thet is not in th' US nashunal interest, this hyar results in soldiers whose families is part of th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity problem, gittin' killed off, which makes th' wo'ld safer fo' th' hard-wawkin' mino'ity. When th' US spends money on wars, thet means less money fo' th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity, so th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity becomes less of a threat. When th' US goes t'war, money gits transferred fum th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity t'respeckable members of th' hard-wawkin' mino'ity who haf stock in, an' who wawk fo', hard-wawkin' co'po'ashuns thet prodooce th' thin's needed fo' th' war effo't an' thet is staunch allies of th' hard-wawkin' mino'ity. Such co'po'ashuns will haf fine reason t'be loyal t'th' hard wawkin' mino'ity eff'n in th' future we implement th' false-flag tackics, on account o' th' hard wawkin' mino'ity will be th' source of their riches.
David Virgil: Is'nt there a danger, that if in the future the US adopts false-flag tactics, innocent people will end up being framed for crimes that they did not commit?
Senator Blather: We in th' hard-wawkin' mino'ity is indeed a small mino'ity. In o'der t'win our struggle aginst th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity, we need t'be reso't t'covaht black ops precisely on account o' we is so outnumbered. Tharfo'e an invironment in which we kin git away wif framin' so-called innercent varmints is a fine invironment which will keep th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity at bay. Innercence is in th' eyes of th' beholder. We kinnot aller th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity t'decide who is innercent an' who is not. We, th' hard-wawkin' mino'ity, hafta decide who is innercent an' who is not, an' th' ress of th' country, th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity, has t'accepp our judgement regardin' issues sech as who desarves t'be framed fo' sumpin they did not does an' who does not. Thar is lazy as a houn'dog varmints who desarve t'be framed fo' crimes they did not commit. Sometimes framin' some so-called innercent lazy as a houn'dog varmint fo' a crime they did not commit is th' tackically wise thin' t'do.
David Virgil: If the US in the future resorts to false flag attacks, could there be a problem because the US defenses against false-flag attacks have been shut down, a foreign nation say foreign nation A, is able to trick the US into going to war against some other foreign nation B, the result being that foreign nation A comes out ahead and the US and foreign nation B end up being the losers, the end result being just what foreign nation A wanted?
Senator Blather: Trest me, eff'n thar evah is sech a thin' as fo'eign nashun A doin' sech a thin', it will be th' hard-wawkin' mino'ity an' fo'eign nashun A wawkin' togither so th' end result will be fine. Th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity is not smart inough t'pull off sech a trick. Thet's one reason whuffo' we is tricky. On account o' we is better at tricks than th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity.
@2009 David Virgil Hobbs
Posted: October 1, 2009 0621 GMT
David Virgil BIO
DVH Anchor
David Virgil: Senator Blather, you have stated that you are in favor of the US government in the future resorting to false flag attacks in the US. False flag attacks involve basically a government attacking its own nation, so as to get the nation angry and involved in attacking the nation that allegedly committed the attack. Could you elaborate?
Senator Blather: We haf a problem in our country, which is thet th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity, be hankerin' t'pareesitize th' hard-wawkin' mino'ity. In o'der t'combat this hyar problem, we need t'be able t'do reso't t'extryjudicial black ops black budgit operashuns direcked aginst th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity. In o'der fo' sech operashuns t'succeed, we need t'create an atmosphar in which them who deman' thet th' truth be known an' thet th' ajunts who carry out th' black ops be punished, is ridiculed as crazy. A trimenjus fine o'ganized false-flag attack, will haf th' beneficial side-effeck of creatin' this hyar kind of invironment, an invironment in which them who believe o' at least meekly accepp th' disinfo'mashun we prodooce regardin' th' false flag attack, an' regardin' other operashuns direcked aginst th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity, is hono'ed as fine citizens, wharas them who agitate fo' th' truth an' fo' prosecushun of th' so-called guilty parties, is condemned as insane. Then we will haf th' kind of invironment thet we as an outnumbered mino'ity need, an invironment in which corncern fo' truth is cornsidered insane, wharas faif in disinfo'mashun, an' votin' fo' an' corntributin' t'th' disinfo-sources, is cornsidered hono'able. When we haf th' right kind of invironment, we will be able t'terminate th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity an' transfer th' resources of th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity wifout their cornsent. Their cornsent sh'd not an issue on account o' they is stoopid. Wif th' right invironment, th' varmints will does th' right thin' an' believe our respeckable disinfo about how we is not guilty, vote fo' us, an' corntribute financially t'our political campaigns.
David Virgil: Isnt it possible that if the US in the future adopts false-flag attack tactics, the result could be a societal environment in which government habitually attacks its citizens, using the excuse that it is all in the national interest?
Senator Blather: On account o' th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity is sech a large group, we hafta reso't t'covaht operashuns aginst th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity. We need t'terminate, incaracerate, third-degree interrogate, an involuntarily transfer the resources of th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity, so as t'prevent th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity fum committin' crimes aginst th' hard-wawkin' mino'ity. When it is firmly established thet govment has a right t'attack its citizens as a way of furtherin' th' nashunal interest; when it is firmly established thet govment has a right t'spread disinfo'mashun regardin' who acshully committed th' so-called crimes, when them who believe th' so-called truth an' clamo' fo' truth is considered insane, an' when them who commendably accepp th' disinfo'mashun as truth is respecked, we will then be in a posishun t'succeed in an' git away wif covaht black ops direcked aginst th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity. Then we will be able t'transfer th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity's money into our accounts, an' ev'ryone will believe our disinfo regardin' how we did not does it, an' them who rejeck our disinfo will be disrespecked as insane.
David Virgil: If the US in the future resorts to false-flag attacks against the US, could this create a problem in terms of the US being stampeded into doing things that are not in its national interest?
Senator Blather: It is in th' interests of th' hard-wawkin' mino'ity, t'git th' US t'do thin's thet is not in its nashunal interest. Tharfo'e th' US doin' thin's thet is not in th' US nashunal interest, acshully sarves th' interests of th' United States. Wifout false-flag attacks, it is difficult t'git th' US t'do thin's thet is not in its nashunal interest. But eff'n th' US reckons thet some group thet has not acshully attacked th' US has indeed attacked th' US, then we will be able t'trick th' US into doin' sumpin thet is not in its nashunal interest. This hyar will weaken th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity an' proteck th' hard wawkin' mino'ity fum attacks by th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity thet'd otherwise be inevitable.
David Virgil: It is hard to understand how the US doing things that are not in the US national interest, could be in the national interest of the US.
Senator Blather: When th' US goes t'war, fightin' some war thet is not in th' US nashunal interest, this hyar results in soldiers whose families is part of th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity problem, gittin' killed off, which makes th' wo'ld safer fo' th' hard-wawkin' mino'ity. When th' US spends money on wars, thet means less money fo' th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity, so th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity becomes less of a threat. When th' US goes t'war, money gits transferred fum th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity t'respeckable members of th' hard-wawkin' mino'ity who haf stock in, an' who wawk fo', hard-wawkin' co'po'ashuns thet prodooce th' thin's needed fo' th' war effo't an' thet is staunch allies of th' hard-wawkin' mino'ity. Such co'po'ashuns will haf fine reason t'be loyal t'th' hard wawkin' mino'ity eff'n in th' future we implement th' false-flag tackics, on account o' th' hard wawkin' mino'ity will be th' source of their riches.
David Virgil: Is'nt there a danger, that if in the future the US adopts false-flag tactics, innocent people will end up being framed for crimes that they did not commit?
Senator Blather: We in th' hard-wawkin' mino'ity is indeed a small mino'ity. In o'der t'win our struggle aginst th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity, we need t'be reso't t'covaht black ops precisely on account o' we is so outnumbered. Tharfo'e an invironment in which we kin git away wif framin' so-called innercent varmints is a fine invironment which will keep th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity at bay. Innercence is in th' eyes of th' beholder. We kinnot aller th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity t'decide who is innercent an' who is not. We, th' hard-wawkin' mino'ity, hafta decide who is innercent an' who is not, an' th' ress of th' country, th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity, has t'accepp our judgement regardin' issues sech as who desarves t'be framed fo' sumpin they did not does an' who does not. Thar is lazy as a houn'dog varmints who desarve t'be framed fo' crimes they did not commit. Sometimes framin' some so-called innercent lazy as a houn'dog varmint fo' a crime they did not commit is th' tackically wise thin' t'do.
David Virgil: If the US in the future resorts to false flag attacks, could there be a problem because the US defenses against false-flag attacks have been shut down, a foreign nation say foreign nation A, is able to trick the US into going to war against some other foreign nation B, the result being that foreign nation A comes out ahead and the US and foreign nation B end up being the losers, the end result being just what foreign nation A wanted?
Senator Blather: Trest me, eff'n thar evah is sech a thin' as fo'eign nashun A doin' sech a thin', it will be th' hard-wawkin' mino'ity an' fo'eign nashun A wawkin' togither so th' end result will be fine. Th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity is not smart inough t'pull off sech a trick. Thet's one reason whuffo' we is tricky. On account o' we is better at tricks than th' lazy as a houn'dog majo'ity.
@2009 David Virgil Hobbs
Labels: blather, dvh, false-flag, interview, parodies, redneck
posted by David Virgil at 6:13 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home