RE the idea that atheists are less dangerous and terrifying than theists/deists

A current idea is that theists/deists are more dangerous and terrifying than atheists. Thus the theists/deists in mideast nations are presumed to be more dangerous than the atheists in the Soviet Union were or the Chinese atheists in the PRC are. Thus the theists/deists in the mideast are targetted with military attacks that atheists in the Soviet Union were not targetted with and that atheists in China are not targetted with.

In contradiction of this idea, lies the fact that there are atheist men who steal and terrorize those who would recover the thefts; they extort, and terrorize those who would recover what is extorted; at the same time, these activities of theirs do not make them positive forces in national or international society.

The current idea, extolls atheists as being more political, selfish, and power hungry than theists/deists, and also, the doctrine praises atheists as being less self-sacrificing, less dangerous, and less terrifying than theists/deists.

Again in contradiction of the current idea, the fans of atheism fail to see that atheists can be a problem for a people or a federation of peoples, because they are too political, too selfish, too power hungry; and also because they are not self-sacrificing enough, not dangerous enough, and not terrifying enough when it comes to intimidating enemies of the people, or enemies of the federation of peoples, enemies that are not a positive force in national or international society.



@2006 David Virgil Hobbs